Reported Migration Acceleration
Reported against lift-and-shift in the supplied accelerator material.
Implementation approach
Migrating Legacy Automation Workflows
Xalta’s migration accelerator material reports 3× faster migration versus lift-and-shift, 100% evaluation coverage and zero production regressions at cutover. Its approach combines dependency discovery, conversion with engineering review, comparison runs and controlled release.
Discuss a Similar Project
Reported Migration Accelerator Metrics
Figures supplied for the accelerator; the comparison baseline and accepted test scope must be defined for the programme.
Reported Evaluation Coverage
Coverage refers to the accepted evaluation scope, which must be defined for the programme.
Reported Regressions at Cutover
Zero production regressions is a reported source outcome, not an unconditional release guarantee.
Pre-Cutover Validation
Comparison runs evaluate the target workflow before the agreed release decision.
Workflow context
Workflow and Project Scope
This approach supports organisations consolidating automation platforms, responding to licence changes or modernising older RPA workflows. The starting point is the existing estate, its business rules and the systems each automation depends on.
Assessment establishes the target platform, supported conversion path and engineering work needed for the programme. The scope connects technical dependencies with the business behaviour that must be preserved.
The challenge
Operational Challenges
A successful migration needs to preserve the business behaviour of each workflow, not only reproduce its activities on another platform.
Incomplete Asset Knowledge
Undocumented workflows and dependencies make migration scope difficult to estimate.
Platform-Specific Activities
Packages, selectors and application interactions do not always translate directly.
Unclear Acceptance Evidence
Without representative tests, teams may discover changed behaviour only after release.
Production Continuity Requirements
Business processes still need a clear owner, release decision and recovery path during transition.
The solution
Solution Approach
The methodology separates discovery, conversion, remediation and acceptance so each workflow moves through a defined release process.
Automated inventory and dependency mapping establish the scope. Supported patterns use conversion tooling, while engineers review unsupported activities and application-specific behaviour. Regression and functional checks support business sign-off.
Assessed Automation Inventory
Record the workflows, dependencies and complexity needed for migration planning.
Supported Conversion and Remediation
Translate reusable patterns and identify the engineering work that still requires review.
Validation Evidence
Compare the migrated workflow against the agreed functional and exception scenarios.
Cutover and Support Plan
Define release waves, operating ownership and the response to issues after transition.
Human Review and Operational Control
Engineers review converted logic and platform-specific changes. Process owners approve the expected behaviour, acceptance evidence and production release; automation does not decide its own readiness.
How it works
Workflow and System Integration
The stages below show the intended implementation path.
- 01
Inventory Existing Workflows
Collect the supported source assets, configuration and process ownership.
Asset discovery - 02
Map Dependencies
Identify applications, packages, credentials and data needed by each workflow.
Dependency assessment - 03
Convert Supported Patterns
Apply the tooling appropriate to the selected source and target platforms.
Conversion framework - 04
Review and Remediate
Resolve unsupported activities and confirm the required business behaviour.
Engineering review - 05
Validate the Workflow
Run agreed regression, exception and comparison checks before acceptance.
Test and shadow-run harness - 06
Transition and Monitor
Release the accepted wave and monitor the agreed production behaviour.
Cutover dashboard + support
Implementation approach
Implementation Approach
The approach uses phased assessment, engineering and acceptance rather than a single unrestricted conversion step.
Assess and Plan the Waves
Confirm the inventory, target constraints, dependencies and migration priorities.
Convert and Validate
Review translated work, remediate gaps and compare the resulting behaviour with the agreed acceptance set.
Control the Production Transition
Release accepted workflows in the agreed waves and monitor the operational result.
Platform-Specific Scope
The source and target versions, supported activities, application access and acceptance criteria must be agreed for the actual programme.
Platforms, Technology and Architecture
Platform options and integration layers are selected around the agreed scope.
- Discovery
Inventory and dependency mapping
Creates the assessed source estate and migration plan.
- Conversion
Migration accelerator framework
Applies the tooling supported for the selected conversion path.
- Target options
A360 / UiPath / Power Automate
Examples in the portfolio; a specific target must be selected, not assumed.
- Validation
Regression and shadow-run harness
Compares behaviour across the agreed normal and exception scenarios.
- Operations
Cutover and monitoring dashboard
Supports release ownership, issue visibility and post-transition support.
Reported solution performance
Reported Migration and Release Performance
The supplied accelerator figures are 3× faster migration, 100% evaluation coverage and zero production regressions at cutover. Programme reporting should define the migration baseline, accepted scenario inventory and production observation window before treating those figures as client-specific results.
| Workflow measure | Reference workflow | Reported solution approach | Reported solution metric |
|---|---|---|---|
| Migration speed | The source compares the accelerator with a lift-and-shift migration approach. | The supplied material reports migration at three times the speed of that reference approach. | 3×Reported Migration Acceleration |
| Evaluation coverage | Unspecified test scope makes it difficult to establish which behaviours have been checked. | The supplied accelerator material reports complete coverage of its evaluation scope. | 100%Reported Evaluation Coverage |
| Cutover quality | Behaviour differences can remain undetected without agreed comparisons and release checks. | Evaluation-gated cutover and shadow runs support the zero-regression result reported in the material. | 0Reported Regressions at Cutover |
| Validation approach | Teams may rely on conversion completion without comparing representative behaviour. | Shadow-run and evaluation evidence supports engineering and business acceptance. | Shadow runsPre-Cutover Validation |
Acceleration Against a Defined Baseline
The reported 3× figure uses lift-and-shift as its reference. Compare equivalent workflow scope and engineering work when evaluating a programme.
Evaluation-Gated Release
Regression checks and shadow runs support a release decision based on demonstrated behaviour and an agreed acceptance scope.
Related offerings
Related Solutions and Services
Explore the solution, supporting service and industry context for this workflow.
Automation Migration Accelerator
Assess, convert and validate supported automation workflows.
Systems Integration & Modernization Services
Modernise the systems and interfaces supporting business processes.
IT Operations & Compliance Automation
Improve the control and support of operational workflows.
Discuss a Similar Requirement
Tell us which platforms, workflow volumes and operational constraints your migration involves. We can define an assessment and the evidence needed for a controlled transition.
Talk to Our Team